Afghanistan: A Buzzing Market for Agribusiness and ICT

By Catarina Santos

“The Afghan government knows the country’s economic and social improvement is not possible without an effective partnership with the private sector. With implementation of the new policy, basic and revenue generating infrastructures would be taken out of the government’s monopoly.”

Hamayon Qayumi, Senior Advisor to President Ghani

The “Open Access and Competitive Law” policy approved by the Afghan High Economic Council in October 2016 will facilitate private investment in the country, improve the communications and information technology sector, and enable greater access to the internet.

Introduction

The United States, in partnership with the international community, has spent the greater part of the last 15 years dedicating extensive resources to Afghanistan in an attempt to foster economic growth. Now the Afghan government is striving to move away from an aid-dependent economy to a market-oriented one. This article will look at the current investment climate in Afghanistan and the type of investments with the potential to prosper against the overall risks. The discussion will offer clarity on the country’s current financial and security situation and analyze how the agribusiness and information and communications technology (ICT) sectors likely pose the strongest foreign investment opportunities.

Progress in Afghanistan After 15 years of Development Aid

While significant reforms in Afghanistan are still needed, including enacting tax reform that will raise greater revenue to cover government expenditures, it is important to acknowledge the accomplishments of 15 years of donor engagement. Although levels of production remain below pre-conflict levels, development implementers have contributed greatly to improvements in Afghan infrastructure, including providing reliable internet connectivity and consistent electricity. Approximately 3,000 miles of roads were paved following the post-Taliban era.

Despite on-going security challenges, progress has been achieved in health, education and gender equality. Afghanistan’s ranking on the Human Development Index (HDI),which uses access to education, healthcare, and similar indicators to create a proxy for quality of life, has shown a dramatic improvement over the last 15 years, climbing from 0.35 in 2001 to 0.47 in 2014. HDI ranges between zero and one: one equals the highest quality of life, with the United States scoring 0.915. Today, 85 percent of the Afghan population has access to adequate healthcare coverage – a striking increase from the nine percent under Taliban rule. In the education realm, nearly 75,000 Afghans – 35 percent of whom are women – now have the opportunity to enroll in higher education institutions, with 15 new universities built. Women’s participation at the government level has also improved. Today 28 percent of the seats in the Afghan Parliament are occupied by women, which is higher than the percentage of females in the U.S. Congress (15.2 percent) and in the UK Parliament (19.7 percent).

Continuing Challenges to the Economy and Investment Climate

The demographic challenges of a growing population, declining aid, and fragility and conflict have kept Afghanistan’s economic growth at two to four percent a year in recent years. It is not surprising that the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index has placed Afghanistan in the 177th position out of 189 countries. However, the government has emphasized the need for private investment in its country strategy for 2017-2021. This strategy highlights the government’s desire to change the “structure of [their] economy from one of import and distribution to one where [there is] a thriving private sector — from small farmers and urban businesses to large manufacturers.” In order to foster economic growth and move away from an aid-based economy, the government has asked for more private sector investment, especially in the agribusiness and ICT sectors.

It is important to highlight some recent advancements that may make private investment in Afghanistan more viable. Afghanistan recently became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), opening up its exports to 163 markets around the world and catalyzing other needed reforms and projects. An equally important move will be to  comply with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), a global standard to promote open and accountable management of resources. Achieving these standards helps Afghanistan to make more effective use of its mineral resources, worth over one trillion dollars. So far the government has not been able to extract these resources, mainly because they have been exploited by insurgents. The Taliban gains about $20 million per year in profits from the lapis mines in the northeast region of Badakhshan. It is therefore crucial that Afghanistan is able to meet the EITI standards, which will support the government to collect revenue, assess what challenges lay ahead, and propose improvements in auditing practices. Implementing the EITI standards has successfully led other countries to mitigate illegal mining, increase revenue from this industry and separate the roles of government agencies.

On the fronts of rule of law and transparency, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), in partnership with the Afghan Ministry of Commerce and Industry, is actively working to improve the country’s investment climate. IFC’s strategy focuses on encouraging economic development by providing advisory services on a range of investments. This has included supporting Afghan farmers by providing advisement on improving farming practices, boosting their incomes by 60 percent. The program also helped link farmers to exporters, which in turn were given increased access to new markets.  Participation in this program demonstrates 1) the commitment of the Afghan government to cooperate and improve the business environment and 2) that international actors are supporting Afghanistan in their efforts to foster a private sector-friendly environment.

A remaining question might be whether the political will for reform is complemented by the government’s ability to improve corruption and fight the illicit economy that grew during almost three decades of war and conflict. Only time will answer that, and in the meantime it is important for the private sector to take advantage of the momentum and invest in the Afghan market.

Why Should the Private Sector Invest, and in What Specific Areas?

Afghanistan will most likely not be the first option for an investor, considering the ongoing security challenges and a government that seems to have the will but not necessarily the capacity to deal with the challenges that scare off potential investors. When making investment decisions, a key factor for companies is to be able to predict the outcome of their investment. How much will they profit, despite the risks and the costs of tackling them? Only a certain type of investor would be willing to take the high risk and the uncertainty of an investment in Afghanistan; however, there are clear opportunities. The private sector should invest in sectors where the opportunity and the risk are more easily manageable and in regions of the country with a more favorable investment climate.  Kabul is the fifth largest growing city in the world, meaning that there is a growing urban population, a rural exodus, and returning refugees. These people will need jobs, housing, food, and ICT to progress.

4906965175_c8d486e0d0_o

The fast urbanization of Kabul, provides opportunities for companies willing to invest in ICT. Photo courtesy of Flickr user Joe Burger, under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License.

Few companies to date have decided to invest in Afghanistan, leaving the market unsaturated and open for opportunity. This may attract big firms that have the capital and time to assume the risk. ICT and agribusiness are the two buzzing sectors that call for the most investment and are where foreign capital can have the greatest impact. For example, foreign investment in technology and education in sustainable agricultural practices can catalyze the development of greater domestic production. In doing so, it can yield profits for farmers and for the investment company while supporting the local Afghan farmers to comply with the sustainable agriculture goal set by the Sustainable Development Goals. Large supermarket chains in high-income countries should incentivize Afghanistan to adapt a “contract farming” model. Under this model, firms contract local farmers and assist them with production phases they meets export requirements. A successful example is Rumi Spice, an American company that imports Afghan spices directly from local farmers, providing them an alternative to growing poppy for opium. In 2016 the company earned $500,000 from the project and will be hiring 300 to 400 local women to expand the project.

The ICT sector has been reported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as one of the most successful industries in Afghanistan, in which the private sector has invested almost $2 billion as of 2013. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reported in July that in 2013 alone, the government collected $1.81 billion in revenues, making the ICT sector “Afghanistan’s greatest source of foreign direct investment, largest remitter of taxes to the government, and largest licit employer.” Unlike many developing countries, the telecommunications system in Afghanistan has been based on free market competition since 2005, as opposed to being state-owned. It is a sector that has created employment opportunities, generated revenue for the government and provided mobile phone services to almost 90 percent of the population. However, there is still room for investment, especially in providing access to internet. According to Internet World Stats, only 12 percent of the population in Afghanistan has access to internet. Given that 90 percent of Afghans have a mobile phone, providing internet capabilities not only presents an investment opportunity but also empowers the people by allowing them to have formal access to mobile finance.

Conclusion

Despite its ongoing security challenges, in recent years Afghanistan has met different international standards that have improved its investment climate. A simple cost-benefit analysis will not place Afghanistan on top of the investing market options, but a long-term, approach might lead a company to a success story like Rumi Spice. When companies are willing to engage in a fast-paced and challenging environment like Afghanistan, ICT and agribusiness are growing sectors that hold potential for both financial gains and social returns.

Redefining Emergency Education for Syrian Youth

By Neha Rauf

26588456424_98a11b888e_o

Syrian refugee children attend a lesson in a UNICEF temporary classroom in July 2014. Photo courtesy of Flickr user DFID- UK Department for International Development, under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

The Need for Emergency Education in Syria

As Syria heads into the sixth year of its humanitarian crisis, one of the major side effects of the conflict has been the high number of refugee children in need of emergency education. Today, more than 1.5 million Syrian children, who make up over half of total refugee children living in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan, are not enrolled in school. The average length of a refugee crisis is 26 years, meaning some of these children will spend their entire childhood displaced and in need of emergency education. If Syrian children do not return to school, Syria is sacrificing its already tenuous future—the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates suggest this education gap would result in the loss of $10.7 billion in human capital.

Continue reading

Hawala: An International Development Tool?

By Catarina Santos

Introduction

Roughly 38 percent of the two billion people in the world’s lowest economic percentile do not have bank accounts and therefore lack access to the global financial market.  Hawala, or “transfer” in Arabic, is a remittance system that runs parallel to formal financial system transactions. Although it is often associated with financing terrorist activities, narcotics trafficking and tax evasion, and is therefore illegal in most countries, hawala can be an important tool to facilitate the sending of remittances. This is especially the case for poorer populations in developing countries and for transactions by undocumented people. In fact, remittances received through hawala account for a third of Somalia’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Despite its ubiquity in many parts of the world, hawala remains under the radar. This article provides a background on how hawala functions, discusses why it can be an attractive alternative remittance system, and considers whether hawala should be regulated as a security threat or promoted as a development tool.

Background on hawala and how it works

Hawala started in South Asia around the 18th century, before Western banking practices reached the region. It evolved over the years and today is used mostly by migrant workers overseas for financial transactions domestically and internationally. This system distinguishes itself from the traditional remittance systems because it is largely based on trust and uses family connections and affiliations within communities to circulate money between “hawaladars,” or hawala dealers.

Why would migrants prefer to use this system over an official banking system? The main reasons are cost effectiveness, efficiency, reliability, lack of bureaucracy, and tax evasion. This system does not require identification documents or formal bank accounts, and does not leave a paper trail.  Users of this method are therefore often associated with undocumented people and people committing illegal activities.

Continue reading

Creating Public-Private-Military Partnerships to Fill Administrative and Financial Gaps in U.S. Infrastructure Reconstruction Projects in Afghanistan

By Jackson Celestin 

On March 11, 2016, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) John F. Sopko released a report reviewing 45 Department of Defense (DOD) reconstruction projects in Afghanistan. Of the 45 projects, 28 did not meet structural contract requirements or technical specifications, 16 were structurally deficient to the point that they were considered unsafe for use, and 7 of the 15 completed projects had never been used. According to Sopko, the projects suffered from inadequate contractors, project management and oversight; and faulty building materials. To limit deficient projects, Sopko suggested the DOD improve its project planning and design procedures, hire contractors who are qualified and capable of complying with construction requirements, and conduct adequate oversight to guarantee that projects are built to protocol and contractors are held accountable

 Though Sopko’s recommendations are reasonable solutions, they ignore larger trends visible in the U.S.’ reconstruction budget in Afghanistan. Of the $114.92 billion the U.S. has spent since 2002 through the Afghanistan Reconstruction Fund, the DOD has dedicated $10.68 billion (9 percent) to Operations and Oversight and only $990 million (less than 1 percent) to the main infrastructure fund, the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (AIF).

Between Sopko’s report and the allocation of U.S. reconstruction funds in Afghanistan, there appears to be an expertise, administration, and funding gap that is preventing the United States from establishing sustainable infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. In the field of international development, this is a common challenge, and more agencies are turning to public-private partnerships (PPPs) to address it. Inspired by PPPs in international development, this blog presents a new model that partners the public and private sectors with the military. This article will refer to this model as Public-Private-Military Partnerships (PPMPs). Though they may face challenges in attracting private investors, working with low starting budgets, and addressing anti-Western and anti-military perceptions, PPMPs can combine the groups’ comparative advantages to fill the knowledge and funding gap in the United States’ Afghanistan reconstruction projects. They can also further connect the military to global development for better military assistance in conflict areas and help conflict and post-conflict areas to pursue global development and sustainability goals.

jackson-blog

This graph is an original creation of the author, Jackson Celestin, based on data from the July 30, 2016 SIGAR Quarterly Report to Congress.

Continue reading

Youth at Risk: How can the Private Sector help Nigeria Fight Boko Haram?

By Catarina Santos

Introduction

Since 2007, Nigeria has attracted the most foreign direct investment in Sub-Sahara Africa due to its well-developed legal and banking systems. However, Boko Haram’s spread of violence to regions where oil and gas are extracted is now intimidating investors. Economically empowering youth is a key piece in this puzzle: the private sector needs a workforce, and youth need employment opportunities as an alternative to joining insurgent groups. Although radicalized Nigerians have not yet reached European or American cities, the potential for global economic impact from terrorism in Nigeria deserves attention. This article discusses the importance of the private sector’s involvement in fighting Boko Haram in Nigeria and recommends that the private sector focus on engaging in the northeast region of the country. The private sector should provide capacity building in various skills, especially sustainable agriculture practices; support youth education; and provide financial grants in areas that government programs have not reached.

Occupy_Nigeria_rally_in_Ojota_Temi (2)

A youth rally in Lagos, Nigeria in September 2012. Youth compose a significant portion of Nigerian society and lack economic opportunities, making them vulnerable to recruitment by Boko Haram. Photo courtesy of Flickr user Temi Kogbe, under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

Continue reading