By Ariel Gandolfo
According to a new Oxfam report, in 2014 the richest 1% of the world’s population owned 47% of the world’s wealth. By 2016, this same elite will own more than half, meaning that 1% of the world’s population is as wealthy as the other 99%. But is such dramatic inequality necessarily bad for a society?
Yes: research shows that less equal societies experience slower and less sustainable economic growth, and that extreme inequality undermines social trust and national cohesion. These consequences can fuel instability and conflict and discourage long-term investment in national development. The new research has large implications for governments and international development agencies, especially in light of rising inequality in some of the world’s largest emerging economies.
In the BRICS countries, which have experienced solid economic growth over the last few decades, new data indicates that in addition to GDP, inequality is on the rise. The Gini coefficient measures the percent of national income (different from total wealth) earned by the top twenty percent of income earners, meaning that a score closer to 1 indicates more inequality as the upper quintile earns a disproportionately large share of salaries and wages. According to their own data, the BRICS countries report Gini coefficients of: Brazil: .5, Russia: .42, India: .37 (urban) and .28 (rural), and China: .47. In South Africa, one of the world’s most unequal nations, the Gini coefficient of .65 signifies that the richest twenty percent earns sixty-five percent of the national income. An Oxfam report on inequality in the BRICS group has similar findings, shown below.
Inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient in the BRICS countries and OECD average, for the early 1990s and late 2000s. Source: Oxfam
By Elizabeth Melampy
A recent USAID study points out that 80 percent of employers in Southeast Asia want to hire more workers, but only 15 percent think education systems are adequately preparing the workforce for available jobs. This difference between employers’ needs and the workforce’s skills is known as a ‘skills gap,’ and workforce training programs are one of the best ways to minimize this gap. Donors and host country governments have leaned on STEM-AT (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, accounting, and tourism) training initiatives to meet these needs, to meet private sector demand, and to create more competitive economies.
In 2014, USAID established the ‘Connecting the Mekong through Education and Training’ (COMET) program to help meet these needs and help create a more competitive workforce in Southeast Asia. The five-year initiative works closely with the private sector to train students in 12 universities and 90 vocational centers across Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia in STEM-oriented programs to help secure employment in the region. USAID has organized workforce training in the past, but in the last five years has renewed efforts to build a workforce to meet the specific demands of the markets in developing regions. In addition, the initiative builds on the Obama administration’s ‘Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative’ (YSEALI) and the Lower Mekong Initiative (LMI) to enable job-ready graduates with practical education.
Students at Saigon International University in Vietnam.